French · On campus
Sixth form
AEFE lists the homologated French grades: Première; Terminale. Other school pathways are not implied by French homologation.
Pathway detailsCollège du Léman — Versoix
74, route de Sauverny, 1290 Versoix, Suisse, Switzerland
Collège du Léman is a private day and boarding school in Versoix, publishing an overall age range of 2–18. The French route recorded here covers Première and Terminale only; broader school provision does not establish French curriculum eligibility in younger phases.
At a glance
- Curriculum pathways
- French
- School stages
- Early years · Primary · Secondary · Sixth form
- Teaching language
- French in the homologated pathway; confirm other language arrangements
- Published age range
- Ages 2–18
- Location
- 74, route de Sauverny, 1290 Versoix, Suisse, Versoix
- Boarding
- Available
- English language support
- Ask admissions
Entry ages & placement
The school publishes an overall age span of 2–18. That span covers the school, while the cited French homologation covers Première and Terminale only. Confirm birthday cutoffs, placement and boarding eligibility with admissions.
School admission age detailsCurriculum by phase
Programmes & opportunities
Sources & dates
- AEFE school record and homologated grade table
School identity · Physical address · Homologated French grades · CNED distinction · French pathway phase map · Official website reference · Entry policy review gap · Current tuition review gap
- School-owned institutional reference
Institution identity · School-owned website reference
- Ministry explanation of homologation and management
French programme interpretation · Conventionné management category · French teaching-language context
- School/operator governance and admissions reference
Operator and admissions context · Private or independent provision review
- School campus and boarding reference
Boarding · Physical Versoix campus
School publications provide the curriculum, programme and fee details above. The review dates refer to those pages; they do not assess teaching quality or individual suitability. Sources & methodology · Suggest a correction